<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you want next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.agileforall.com/2008/08/22/what-do-you-want-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.agileforall.com/2008/08/22/what-do-you-want-next/</link>
	<description>Agile For All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:11:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Hartman</title>
		<link>http://www.agileforall.com/2008/08/22/what-do-you-want-next/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 01:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agileforall.com/blog/?p=26#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Frank, as you know from our conversations, I believe most teams do not do sufficient demos or retrospectives.  One thing I&#039;ve been teaching recently is that people that created the software should not look at the demo, but look at the people watching the demo.  If you don&#039;t invite the right people it is hard to do that!  The advantage of course is you get to see their non-verbal reactions to what they are seeing.  85% of our communication is non-verbal, but we can&#039;t use that if we aren&#039;t watching for it!

- Bob -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, as you know from our conversations, I believe most teams do not do sufficient demos or retrospectives.  One thing I&#8217;ve been teaching recently is that people that created the software should not look at the demo, but look at the people watching the demo.  If you don&#8217;t invite the right people it is hard to do that!  The advantage of course is you get to see their non-verbal reactions to what they are seeing.  85% of our communication is non-verbal, but we can&#8217;t use that if we aren&#8217;t watching for it!</p>
<p>- Bob -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Vega</title>
		<link>http://www.agileforall.com/2008/08/22/what-do-you-want-next/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Vega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agileforall.com/blog/?p=26#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Bob,

Your blog made me reflect on our recent iteration demo (I call them reveals myself) and I came up with these thoughts:

1) Do we really have the right people (the &quot;real&quot; users of our software) attending our demos so that we are getting quality feedback early?

2) Do we take time, possibly after the demo, to &quot;dig&quot; deeper (apply 5 whys) to the feedback we recieve?

3) Is a &quot;15-20&quot; minute slot of time to review the visible features/stories(those that have a GUI aspect) completed in the iteration sufficient?

Maybe just ideas for future blogs at this time but I&#039;d be interested in hearing more for sure.

Thanks,
Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>Your blog made me reflect on our recent iteration demo (I call them reveals myself) and I came up with these thoughts:</p>
<p>1) Do we really have the right people (the &#8220;real&#8221; users of our software) attending our demos so that we are getting quality feedback early?</p>
<p>2) Do we take time, possibly after the demo, to &#8220;dig&#8221; deeper (apply 5 whys) to the feedback we recieve?</p>
<p>3) Is a &#8220;15-20&#8243; minute slot of time to review the visible features/stories(those that have a GUI aspect) completed in the iteration sufficient?</p>
<p>Maybe just ideas for future blogs at this time but I&#8217;d be interested in hearing more for sure.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

