Comments on: Ten Ways to Improve Your Planning Poker Results http://www.agileforall.com/2009/04/02/ten-ways-to-improve-your-planning-poker-results/ Agile For All Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:11:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bob Hartman http://www.agileforall.com/2009/04/02/ten-ways-to-improve-your-planning-poker-results/comment-page-1/#comment-321 Bob Hartman Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:04:26 +0000 http://www.agileforall.com/blog/?p=101#comment-321 Martin, I usually only look for strong consensus, not unanimous votes during planning poker. I would take a 6-2 vote as strong consensus and have moved on with a size of 13 in your scenario. - Bob - Martin, I usually only look for strong consensus, not unanimous votes during planning poker. I would take a 6-2 vote as strong consensus and have moved on with a size of 13 in your scenario.

- Bob -

]]> By: Martin http://www.agileforall.com/2009/04/02/ten-ways-to-improve-your-planning-poker-results/comment-page-1/#comment-320 Martin Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:57:00 +0000 http://www.agileforall.com/blog/?p=101#comment-320 Bob, what if I have six "13 point cards" and two "21 point cards" on the table. They are no changes after 3 runds. Should I take the largest size? Bob, what if I have six “13 point cards” and two “21 point cards” on the table. They are no changes after 3 runds. Should I take the largest size?

]]>